Psychopathy, Quackery, the AAP and Circumcision

Clearly these people will only pay heed to lawsuits and financial liability.  Perhaps they’re worried about losing their prestigious and lucrative positions at the apex of medical respectability.   But the very structure of “medical respectability” is set to collapse under the weight of the evidence of criminal racketeering and wholesale child abuse.  These people are home wreckers and sexual predators, and they sow social degradation, violence and war.  They should be banished from civilization.

A goldfish knows nothing about water. The American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision is unaware of the peculiar circumcising culture in which it is immersed. For example, characters in American TV sitcoms may exhibit a casual vindictiveness toward the foreskin, or the man with one, that would cause widespread outrage if it involved race.1 American medical texts portray “normal” penises as circumcised, and may define the foreskin as “the part removed by circumcision”.2

This unawareness permeates the Task Force’s 2012 circumcision policy.3 Dr Frisch and 37 eminent European pediatricians, speaking for 22 pediatric associations, and for 17 countries from Iceland to Lithuania, have accurately pointed it out. The Task Force’s reply amounts to “Tu quoque” (“You’re another”).

Those countries have “a clear bias against circumcision” the same way they have “a clear bias against parentally-elective infant toe amputation”. They have no Task Forces on Leaving Boys’ Genitals Alone.

The reply, like the policy itself, discounts the only study that actually attempted to measure the sensitivity of the foreskin itself, by ignoring its main, uncontested, finding: “male circumcision ablates the most sensitive part of the penis.”4 ….


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.