Geopolitics of exploitation and circumcisionby Michel Hervé Bertaux-NavoiseauAs dear to enslaver tribalism and feudalism as to the Victorian and Puritan bourgeoisie ofthe 19th century or, today, to U.S. capitalism and its emulators of Muslim countries,South-Korea and Philippine, circumcision is the safest tool of tyranny when it wants to setitself up in the long term. It is one of the most odious and effective ever devisedtechniques of exploitation of man by man.Not content with fetishism of goods, it fetishicizes man himself, playing on his perversetendencies to pass the ring it removes from his sex through his nose. Attacking the bodyof the still child proletarian in its most intimate part, through a savagely traumatizingthreat of castration, it is an extreme form of the alienation generated by compulsion ofdomination and megalomaniac will for power. The incapacity of Arabian revolutions toenable peoples to access to genuine democracy is a testimony of it; they take the powerfrom the feudal tyrants to give it to the religious, the second pole of the feudal society!Circumcision is a strategic element of geopolitics of exploitation. It explains the recentcraze of USA, Israel and the WHO for the mutilation of Africans under the pretext offighting AIDS (Operation Abraham). Other interests likely explain that sudden craze forcircumcision and the important funds that it succeeds to collect. Genocides and warsmultiply at the contact of circumcision1, the latter makes the fortune of gun merchants.It is not irrelevant that France of PS and UMP has been and goes on being widelyimporting as circumcised as submitted labour that can be exploited at will. The proposalof opening Europe to Turkey was dear to Jacques Chirac. Now, the latter, after havingattended tortures during the war in Algeria (this could be read in Le Monde, long ago),accepted the invitation of the Great rabbi of France to the circumcision of his grand-son.Then, the authoritarian governments of Turkey specialized in producing and exportingmass circumcision programs. All this is characteristic of the abject temptation of thefierce obsessive ones who rule us: mutilate or use mutilated labour in order to betterexploit mutilated and… nonmutilated. …
The collapse of the USSR in 1991 was seen as the triumph of capitalism over communism. The 40-year cold war was over and the West had won. That perception, however, was as premature as it was misleading. The struggle of world powers wasn’t over. Today, the struggle continues in a far more fundamental venue; on capitalism’s home court in the arena of paper money.
The West, as Mao Tse-Tung once claimed, is not a paper tiger; unless, of course, you’re referring to its paper money.
In 1991, communism was, in fact, collapsing. But capitalism, unbeknownst to itself and others, was bankrupt after its costly decades-long struggle with communism. Today, the former communist super-powers, Russia and China, have re-emerged and are playing the high-hand of gold against England, the US and the West and their now vulnerable paper currencies.
England’s debt-based paper banknotes were the reason for the West’s three hundred year global hegemony. Because of its ability to wage war on credit and pass off its debt-based paper banknotes as money, England in the 18th and 19th centuries and, later, the US in the 20th achieved a level of world power not seen since the Roman Empire.
In the 1900s, Russia and China escaped the West’s capitalist dominion by adopting communism, an alternate economic paradigm, based on the theories of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels and Vladimir Lenin. Communism was, in fact, a potent and dysfunctional amalgam of untested theories, unfounded hopes and totalitarian state oppression.
Ostensibly offering a more equitable distribution of wealth than the banker’s paradigm of credit and debt, Marxism/Leninism was, in fact, a bloody and costly trap into which Russia and China would both fall in their attempts to escape the West’s economic and political domination.
The West’s attempts to subjugate Russia and China would, however, ultimately cost the West its foundation of economic and political power, i.e. the ability to pass off debt-based paper banknotes as money.
In capitalist economies, debt-based paper money possessed intrinsic value because it was convertible to gold upon demand. Gold, in fact, was capitalism’s ‘secret sauce’, the essential ingredient that transformed the bankers’ debt-based banknotes into something other than government-issued IOUs.
Since 1971, however, the West’s paper banknotes are no longer convertible to gold. This is because after WWII, the US, in its attempts to militarily subjugate Russia and China overspent its massive gold reserves, forcing it to end the gold-convertibility of the US dollar. As a result, all currencies in the world formerly tied to the US dollar and hence to gold became fiat, i.e. currencies who have value only because of government fiat, i.e. command.
After 1971, it was only a matter of time until the bankers’ debt-based paper banknotes—without the convertibility to gold—would become increasingly unstable and ultimately worthless; and, today, in 2013, the former has happened and the latter is underway.
The value of today’s paper money is determined solely by currency speculators placing leveraged bets in the hopes of achieving short-term gains. Once the gold-convertibility of paper money ended, modern currencies became paper coupons with expiration dates written in invisible ink.
Today, the West and its bankers are desperately hoping that no one will notice, hoping thereby to prevent a hyperinflationary collapse of paper money should confidence in fiat paper money evaporate.
Russia and China, however, are preparing for that very day. Russia and China are stockpiling gold as fast as they can in anticipation of a coming currency crisis triggered by the West’s increasingly suspect paper money.
For the former communist powers, Russia and China, it’s payback time; but for England and the US, it’s blowback time …
Check out the charts. The banksters must be desperate for war and/or a fascist takeover of the USA.
The Ukrainian-based feminist group FEMEN, famous for their international bare-breasted protests, stormed a conference in Paris attended by Tunisian President Moncef Marzouki in their recent ‘Topless Jihad’ campaign to protect Muslim women’s rights.
The topless activists came to support Tunisian Amina Tyler, who has been threatened with death in her home country for posting a topless picture of herself online. They also demanded the names of those who shot and killed Tunisian opposition leader Chokri Belaid in February, chanting “Who killed Chokri Belaid?”
Amina Tyler, 19, wrote “My body is mine, not somebody’s honor” across her chest in Arabic in a show of solidarity with FEMEN, and made the image public. The picture sparked rage among religious Muslimsm and ultraconservative Tunisian religious groups now say the girl deserves death by stoning. …
Once again, organized religion has shown itself to be an appendage of the modern religion of statism whose first commandment is to destroy the family, the last holdout of individual empowerment and self-determination. This perverse caricature of human morality is epitomized in the islamic, judaic and american medical “holy rite” of genital mutilation.
I imagine telling the tunisians of the USA’s role in deliberately funding and organizing the rise of fundamentalist islam in afghanistan, iran and iraq, as a tool of central bankster imperial policy, would simply blow their minds. It would be beyond their comprehension, as it is beyond the comprehension of most americans. We are all peasants to the masters of public perception.
A trove of leaked classified reports has confirmed what many had suspected – US drone kills in Pakistan are not the precision strikes against top-level al-Qaeda terrorists they are portrayed as by the Obama administration.
Instead, many of the attacks are aimed at suspected low-level tribal militants, who may pose no direct danger to the United States – and for many there appears to be little evidence to justify the assassinations.
Top secret documents obtained by McClatchy newspapers in the US show the locations, identities and numbers of those attacked and killed in Pakistan in 2006-8 and 2010-11, as well as explanations for why the targets were picked.
The statistics illustrate the breadth of the US ‘drone doctrine’ – which has never been defined by consecutive US administrations. Between 1,990 and 3,308 people are reported to have been killed in the drone strikes in Pakistan since 2004, the vast majority of them during the Obama terms.
In the 12-month period up to 2011, 43 out of 95 drone strikes in the reports (which give an account of the vast majority of US operations in the country) were not aimed at al-Qaeda at all. And 265 out of 482 people killed in those assassinations, were defined internally as “extremists”.
Indeed, only six of the men killed – less than two percent – were senior al-Qaeda leaders.
Some of the groups include the Haqqani network and the Taliban Movement of Pakistan, both militant organizations, but ones the US did not designate as terrorists until 2012 and 2010 respectively. Neither one has ever conducted an attack on US soil.
It also confirms that attacks during the George W. Bush era, were conducted on targets picked by ISI, Pakistan’s security agency, which has no obligations to comply with US legal criteria.
Furthermore, in some cases it is difficult to confirm that the targets were militants at all.
In the strikes above, the internal reports showed that only one civilian had been killed. But the modus operandi revealed behind the strikes, shows that some of the attacks seem to have been based on the certain people or visitors being present as certain locations, or merely associating with those the US believes were terrorists. This chimes with the accusation that the US is carrying out a policy of “signature strikes” – attacks based on behavior, or “signature” that would be expected of a terrorist, rather than any specific illegal activity.
These “signatures” apparently include such suspicious behavior as taking part in a funeral procession or first responding to an initial drone strike. Last year, the United Nation’s special rapporteur on human rights and counter-terrorism, Ben Emmerson, said it’s believed that, “since President Obama took office, at least 50 civilians were killed in follow-up strikes when they had gone to help victims and more than 20 civilians have also been attacked in deliberate strikes on funerals and mourners.”
The US has previously refused to admit that it operates such a policy.
The actual “signatures” on these strikes (“from the people of the united states of america”) are an obvious forgery.
In a move to gain total control of the farming industry, three resolutions have been proposed in the state of Missouri. Saint Louis, Missouri is the home of biotech giant Monsanto’s headquarters. These laws have been deceitfully written to appear to support modernization and progression in farming, while in reality their passage will severely limit the rights of small farmers to reuse organic seeds and preserve livestock lines. Small farmers provide consumers with their primary source for local, non GMO, organic foods. It is essential to take action to protect small farmers in individual states, particularly in light of the recent signing of the Monsanto Protection Act by President Obama.
Alternate verbiage that would truly protect family farms was offered well over a month ago to Representative Jason Smith, the sponsor of SJR 11, as a possible substitute. According to a recent post, “no comment or discussion about the alternate language occurred until the conference call the other day, when both Missouri Farmers Care and Smith’s Chief of Staff categorically dismissed the language over their presumption that it wouldn’t protect ‘all’ of agriculture, despite the ability of soy and corn growers to directly market their products if they so desired.” Visit the website of Missouri Farmers Care and you’ll see many logos for big Ag and biotech companies.
Below is the language that was offered as a substitute.
Note: Green text indicates added text, and red [strikethrough] text in brackets indicates deleted text.Section 35. That agriculture which provides food, energy, health benefits, and security is the foundation and stabilizing force of Missouri’s economy. To protect this vital sector of Missouri’s economy, the right of farmers and ranchers to engage in direct trade with consumers
[modern farming and ranching practices] shall be forever guaranteed in this state. No law shall be enacted which abridges the right of farmers and ranchers to employ agricultural [technology and modern livestock production and ranching] practices that secure independent family farm’s ability to save seed, preserve livestock bloodlines, or impede their access to market.
Section B. Pursuant to Chapter 116, RSMo, and other applicable constitutional provisions and laws of this state allowing the General Assembly to adopt ballot language for the submission of a joint resolution to the voters of this state, the official ballot title of the amendment proposed in Section A shall be as follows:
“Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to ensure:
- That the right of Missouri citizens to employ [modern] farming and ranching practices and equipment that insure the continuance of diversified small farms shall not be infringed.”
This issue will affect every single person who eats in Missouri, and it is important for both urban and rural Citizens to understand what is happening with the proposed constitutional amendment. Please read:
A new report on three of the first patients in China to contract a novel strain of bird flu has U.S. officials worried about a grim scenario that includes severe illness with pneumonia, septic shock, brain damage and multi-organ failure.
All three of the patients died, according to a Thursday report by a group of Chinese scientists in the New England Journal of Medicine.
“It is possible that these severely ill patients represent the tip of the iceberg,” wrote Dr. Timothy Uyeki and Dr. Nancy Cox, both of the influenza division at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in a perspective piece accompanying the article.
The reports chronicle the early days of an outbreak of a new influenza A virus, H7N9, which has never before been seen in humans. As of Friday, Chinese officials said it had infected at least 43 people in four Chinese provinces and killed 11 in the past two months. …
According to Andrew Maguire, on Friday, April 12, the Fed’s agents hit the market with 500 tons of naked shorts. Normally, a short is when an investor thinks the price of a stock or commodity is going to fall. He wants to sell the item in advance of the fall, pocket the money, and then buy the item back after it falls in price, thus making money on the short sale. If he doesn’t have the item, he borrows it from someone who does, putting up cash collateral equal to the current market price. Then he sells the item, waits for it to fall in price, buys it back at the lower price and returns it to the owner who returns his collateral. If enough shorts are sold, the result can be to drive down the market price.
A naked short is when the short seller does not have or borrow the item that he shorts, but sells shorts regardless. In the paper gold market, the participants are betting on gold prices and are content with the monetary payment. Therefore, generally, as participants are not interested in taking delivery of the gold, naked shorts do not need to be covered with the physical metal.
In other words, with naked shorts, no physical metal is actually sold.
People ask me how I know that the Fed is rigging the bullion price and seem surprised that anyone would think the Fed and its bullion bank agents would do such a thing, despite the public knowledge that the Fed is rigging the bond market and the banks with the Fed’s knowledge rigged the Libor rate. The answer is that the circumstantial evidence is powerful. …
Do the authorities have the metal with which to cover shorts? I do not know. However, knowledgeable dealers are suspicious. Some think that US physical stocks of gold were used up in sales in efforts to disrupt the rise in the gold price from $272 in December 2000 to $1,900 in 2011. They point to Germany’s recent request that the US return the German gold stored in the US, and to the US government’s reply that it would return the gold piecemeal over seven years. If the US has the gold, why not return it to Germany?
The clear implication is that the US cannot deliver the gold.
Andrew Maguire also reports that foreign central banks, especially China, are loading up on physical gold at the low prices made possible by the short selling. If central banks are using their dollar holdings to purchase bullion at bargain prices, the likely results will be pressure on the dollar’s exchange value and a declining market supply of physical bullion. In other words, by trying to protect the dollar from its quantitative easing policy, the Fed might be hastening the dollar’s demise. …
How in the world could this be a surprise to anyone? The central banks’ business model is to create “money” (that is, money as defined by law) out of thin air and “loan” it at interest to the government. The purchasing power of this “money” is dictated by its ability to purchase real things, like clothes, food and housing, vs the ability of competitive currencies like gold to purchase those things. The dollar price of clothes, food and housing has been rising steadily for years, despite clinton’s fake CPI numbers. In that respect (the most important respect) gold is a superior currency that could put a severe dent in the central bankers’ business. The dollar price of gold has been carefully managed by this cartel for at least 30 years (certainly since the closing of the “gold window” by nixon in the ’70s), by selling naked shorts and, when necessary, by looting sovereign gold hoards (like fort knox) and “loaning” it to scamsters like goldman sachs which then sell it on the open market at the prevailing (managed) price. But make no mistake, the insiders know the physical metal is leaving the market at an increasing rate and those gold “loans” will never be repaid at anywhere near the current price. When the vaults are empty, the next gold short that demands delivery of the metal will force a drastic revaluation of gold. They have already positioned themselves with their looted caches of the metal. Meanwhile, gold is moving from western sovereign vaults to china, where it will be used to leverage their buyout of the american physical infrastructure. No wonder they’re so anxious for obama’s gun control program to move forward. ( http://www.infowars.com/communist-chinese-government-calls-for-americans-to-be-disarmed/ ) They remember mao’s dictum: “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.”
All of this would be irrelevant if the federal government exercised its power to manage the money supply as provided for in the constitution by passing the american monetary act (monetary.org). The depression would disappear practically overnight and this country would become an economic powerhouse once again. And war would no longer be central to the business model of the ultra wealthy masters of sovereign debt (the real masters of war).