Once again the alternative press is proven correct with the assertion that the No. 1 cause of violent shootings is mind-altering psychiatric drugs. New information has been released about the prescription drugs being taken by James Holmes, the mind-controlled Aurora Colorado “Batman” movie theater shooter, and it reveals he was taking two mind-altering prescription medications, including a generic version of Zoloft.
I publicly predicted this on July 20 of 2012, when I wrote, “it is highly likely that James Holmes has been on psychiatric drugs. Not only does he fit the classic definition of a person typically put on psych drugs — young white disturbed male — his actions in the movie theater almost perfectly resemble those of the psyched-out shooters in the 1999 Columbine High School massacre: Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold.”
The establishment tried to bury this fact for as long as possible, but as the LA Times now reports, “District Judge Carlos A. Samour Jr. reversed previous rulings on public access and made public the arrest affidavit and 12 search warrants.”
This website is a collection of 4,800+ news stories with the full media article available, mainly criminal in nature, that have appeared in the media (newspapers, TV, scientific journals) or that were part of FDA testimony in either 1991, 2004 or 2006, in which antidepressants are mentioned.
This web site focuses on the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), of which Prozac (fluoxetine) was the first. Other SSRIs are Zoloft (sertraline), Paxil (paroxetine) (known in the UK as Seroxat), Celexa (citalopam), Lexapro (escitalopram), and Luvox (fluvoxamine). Other newer antidepressants included in this list are Remeron (mirtazapine), Anafranil (clomipramine) and the SNRIs Effexor (venlafaxine), Cymbalta (duloxetine) and Pristiq (desvenlafaxine) as well as the dopamine reuptake inhibitor antidepressant Wellbutrin (bupropion) (also marketed as Zyban). …
The new bird influenza that’s killed six people in eastern China has some of the genetic hallmarks of an easily transmissible virus, according to the scientist who showed how H5N1 avian flu could become airborne.
The H7N9 strain, which is a new virus formed as a result of two others merging their genetic material, has features of viruses that are known to jump easily from birds to mammals, and a mutation that may help it attach to cells in the respiratory tract, said Ron Fouchier, a professor of molecular virology at Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands, in a telephone interview yesterday.
“That’s certainly not good news,” said Fouchier, who reviewed a gene sequencing of H7N9 published by Chinese health authorities. “This virus really doesn’t look like a bird virus anymore; it looks like a mammalian virus.” …
Fouchier authored a study last year that showed five genetic tweaks to the deadly H5N1 virus, which has killed more than 600 people since 2003, made it airborne in ferrets, the mammals whose response to flu most closely resembles that of humans.
One of the mutations he made is in an enzyme called polymerase; another was in a protein called hemagglutinin on the surface of the virus. H7N9 has both mutations, he said.
“This virus is certainly of more concern than the vast majority of bird flu viruses,” Fouchier said. “Most bird flu viruses that we know do not have these mutations.”
Whether those mutations alone are enough to make the virus easily transmissible isn’t clear, and should be “high on the research agenda,” Fouchier said. Still, there’s no evidence yet that the virus is more likely to become more dangerous than H5N1, he said.
“Even if we see relatively high numbers of human cases, it doesn’t mean a pandemic is imminent,” he said. “H5N1 has circulated for 16 years and not become mammal-to-mammal transmissible.” …
Very articulate as usual, yet he has his characteristic blind spots. He speaks of financial “collusion”, which is a synonym for “conspiracy”, yet he absolutely refuses to address the overwhelming scientific proof and political context of the 9/11 conspiracy, the achilles heel of the “war on terror”. He mentions “meaningless paper money” without reference to the entire ponzi scheme of debt based paper money and how it inexorably leads to the irrational short-term profit seeking that he excoriates, to the benefit of the oligarchs who control the central banking cartel.
It’s interesting how the “left” and the “right” wing’s analysis of the systemic problem overlap without either “side” recognizing the common ground: that the system is saturated with conflicts of interest (monopolies). This gets to the issue of whether it is inevitable that a grassroots capitalist system (voluntary economic interactions among autonomous human beings) evolves into concentrations of power. My guess is that it IS inevitable in the absence of legal obstacles to corporate immortality.
It’s a shame that he has never clued into false flag terrorism as an instrument of statecraft. His silence on 9/11 drove a stake into the heart of the anti-war movement. While alex jones isn’t as articulate and careful in his analysis, he’s also not constrained by chomsky’s self-imposed blindness to the hidden machinations of the corporo-governmental convergence. Sometimes one must accept the existence of unknowns and try to deduce around them to form a larger picture. This is the branch of the scientific method which chomsky calls “conspiracy theory”.