According to some estimates, as many as 100,000 innocent people have been kidnapped and tortured by US forces since 9/11. Several of them have been tortured into “confessing” to explosively demolishing the three World Trade Center skyscrapers with box-cutters, as well as a long list of other crimes that they could not possibly have committed.
So you really should consider signing a “Living Will in Case of Torture.” Feel free to use mine as a model. It is entitled: “I LOVE Big Brother – so don’t bother torturing me!”
I, Dr. Kevin J. Barrett, do hereby solemnly affirm that if I should ever find myself strapped to a gurney in a cage in Guantanamo with spark plug wires clamped to my testicles, it shall be absolutely and utterly unnecessary, pointless, and superfluous to torture me, since, if that eventuality should ever ensue, I hereby swear to the following:
*That all those times I said that 9/11 was an inside job, I was just kidding. OF COURSE I don’t really believe that conspiracy theory nonsense!
*That all those times I said that the 9/11 wars were genocidal wars of aggression, I didn’t really mean it. Actually, the people of Iraq and Afghanistan WANTED us to invade and occupy their countries, murder kidnap and torture their young men, rape their women and children, and steal their resources! That’s why they welcomed us with flowers and ticker-tape parades!
*That I think it’s perfectly okay for the President and his Death Committee to sign off on extra-judicial murder, kidnapping and torture, just like the Bill of Rights tells him to.
*That I would like to apologize to the State of Israel and its American agents, who, contrary to some of my ill-considered assertions, are ruling America wisely and justly. I would especially like to commend their monopoly mainstream media, which are doing a terrific job informing Americans about what is really going on in the world.
*And finally, that I hereby confess to any and all crimes ever committed anywhere by anyone, including but not limited to: The Jack the Ripper murders, the Lindberg baby kidnapping, the JFK RFK MLK and Wellstone assassinations, the “terrorist” attacks in New York, Washington, Bali, Madrid, London, and Mumbai, the massacres in Aurora, Newtown, and the Wisconsin Sikh temple, and everything else you’d like to ask me about.
*And by the way, would you like to know the location of that nuclear “ticking time bomb” that will soon blow up a whole city if I don’t tell you where it is? It’s an Israeli mini-nuke, and it’s hidden right up Alan Dershowitz‘s rectum. If you send a SWAT team up there now, they might be able to defuse it in time.
After a week-long on-site investigation, former National Security Agency officer Wayne Madsen is “100% certain” that 9/11 investigator and author Philip Marshall and his two children were killed in a black ops hit. Madsen’s conclusion is that the cover story – an alleged murder-suicide – is transparently absurd.
Madsen stated his conclusions on yesterday’s Kevin Barrett show. Among the evidence cited by Madsen:
*Neighbors’ houses are “practically on top of” Marshall’s house, so dozens of neighbors would have heard any gunshots that weren’t muffled by a silencer…and Marshall’s “patsy gun” did not have a silencer.
*The crime scene was illegally and surreptitiously cleaned up by professionals, including “a SUV, license undetermined, with an array of communication antennas bristling from the roof.”
*Philip Marshall, who had expressed his fear of being harassed or silenced for his 9/11 revelations, never kept his doors open – but when the bodies were found, a side door Marshall never used was wide open.
According to Madsen, all of Marshall’s neighbors believe it was a professional murder, not the murder-suicide claimed by corrupt local police, who have presumably been told what to do and say by higher authorities working on behalf of “national security.”
Marshall, Madsen points out, was not just any 9/11 conspiracy author. A former airline pilot, Marshall was a close associate of notorious CIA drug smuggler Barry Seal, and a peripheral player in the New Orleans CIA/crime nexus that killed JFK, Martin Luther King, and many others. Madsen suggests that Marshall, a long-time participant in covert operations, developed a penchant for truth during the last years of his life.
According to Madsen, Marshall had stated that he was holding explosive information that would be revealed in his next book. The repeated professional-clean-ups of Marshall’s house after the murder suggest that the killers, and the agency or agencies employing them, were looking for a specific piece of evidence or information. (Marshall’s computer mysteriously disappeared after the killings, and its whereabouts remain unknown.)
Transcript follows ….
The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) welcomes that Dr Rajenda Pachauri, the chair of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has acknowledged the reality of the post-1997 standstill in global average temperatures.
The GWPF has been highlighting the global warming standstill for many years against fervent denial by climate activists. Recently, Nasa’s James Hansen also recognised that global temperatures have not risen for more than a decade.
“Even though the scientific case for the standstill is secure, and well represented in peer-reviewed scientific literature, it will surely help the climate debate now that the IPCC chairman has confirmed its existence,” said Dr David Whitehouse, the GWPF’s science editor.
The post-1997 global annual average temperature standstill is one of the most important aspects of current climate science. Its recognition by the chair of the IPCC means there is now growing pressure that this empirical fact will receive full analysis in the forthcoming AR5 report.
The GWPF points out that Dr Pachauri’s assertion that it will take a temperature standstill of “30-40 years at least” to affect theories of man-made global warming is without a scientific basis. “The 17-year standstill already strains climate models, and if it continues for much longer it will demonstrate that the climate models on which the IPCC has based its assumptions are inadequate,” Dr Whitehouse said.
*Interview with Dr Pachauri in The Australian 22 February.
FYI. I haven’t checked out his online archive of research, but it’s at carnicominstitute.org
On February 25, in the small town of Horsham in the United Kingdom, there will be a rare and potentially groundbreaking opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement. Three hours of detailed 9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered in a court of law where the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) will be challenged over the inaccurate and biased manner in which it has portrayed the events and evidence of 9/11.
Over the last 16 months, BBC has been challenged strongly by individuals in the UK over two documentaries that they showed in September 2011 as part of the tenth anniversary of 9/11, namely ‘9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip’ and ‘The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 Ten Years On’.
Formal complaints were lodged with BBC over the inaccuracy and bias of these documentaries, which, according to 9/11 activists, was in breach of the operating requirements of BBC through their ‘Royal Charter and Agreement’ with the British public.
This document requires BBC to show information that is both accurate and impartial. These complaints were supported by the US-based educational charity Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), which submitted detailed scientific evidence to BBC to buttress the complaints. The evidence focuses in particular on the confirmed free-fall of WTC 7 and NIST’s 2008 admission of this fact. In addition, over 300 AE911Truth petition signers supported these complaints by sending letters to BBC, requesting that BBC show this evidence to the public.
Not a single mainstream media has acknowledged the court case. And it is highly unlikely that the proceeding will be the object of unbiased coverage. …
“Substantial numbers of people will have to alter their existing behaviors to address this new class of global environmental problems,” claim the authors, who include Nobel Prize winners and even the infamous but largely discredited biologist and “population bomb” alarmist Paul Ehrlich (shown above). “Alternative approaches are needed when education and persuasion alone are insufficient.”
In simpler terms, the self-styled arbiters of proper environmental stewardship and human values are seeking to use the force of government — without the consent of the governed, if need be — to radically change people’s thoughts and behavior. If taxpayer-funded propaganda and brainwashing fail to convince enough of the public to submit, coercion in the form of new rules, regulations, fines, and other policies will be needed, the authors claim.
“Policy instruments such as penalties, regulations, and incentives may therefore be required to achieve significant behavior modification,” the paper claims matter-of-factly. In a table included within the document, some potential examples of the envisioned “policy instruments” are outlined, starting from taxpayer-funded propaganda — “active norms management: advertising, information, appeals,” as the authors put it — and moving on through taxes, fines, subsidies, and other “financial interventions.”
Finally, at the bottom of the table: laws and regulations demanding obedience at the barrel of a government gun. “Effective policies, then, are ones that induce both short-term changes in behavior and longer-term changes in social norms,” the paper continues, offering some examples of successful and failed efforts to transform human behavior and values using the coercive force of government. “Government is uniquely obligated to locate the common good and formulate its policies accordingly.”
Much of the document is devoted to strategies on changing people’s behavior to suit the pseudo-environmentalist goals of its authors. While it acknowledges that coercion can sometime backfire — noting that forces within the non-coercive sector would also have to participate in the effort if it is to succeed — the brute force of the state is viewed as a key tool in achieving the radical social changes envisioned. …
Are we really at the cusp of a human-caused climate tipping point? State propaganda about carbon emissions is in sharp contrast to its policies wrt genetic modification, recycling, endless gratuitous wars and other major toxic inputs into the environment. It’s notable that commodifying carbon emissions would give the financial masters a strategic choke hold on life-sustaining economic activity down to the grassroots level, and its selective enforcement (which is a given) would serve power-center interests to a tee.
Manufacturing an emergency in order to channel social activity in a given direction is SOP for the oligarchs, and their social control and depopulation agenda is well documented. This is why the “climate emergency” needs to be examined very carefully. Why have global temperatures leveled out while carbon emissions are spiking? Is humanity really a plague, or only the privately controlled monetary system which maximizes waste and creates war?
If you don’t see the totalitarian political and social control angle behind such mistreatment and pleasure-sensory deprivation, you need to turn off your computer and go for a hike in the woods. Every single category this is filed under is appropriate.
Xinhua is virtually the press agency for the Communist Chinese government. The organization, “is subordinate to the State Council and reports to the Communist Party of China’s Propaganda and Public Information Departments.”
In other words, Xinhua represents the pinnacle of Chinese state-run media. Whatever is printed in its editorial pages represents the opinion of the ruling Communist Party leaders.
The article calls on Obama to exploit the tragedy to push his gun control agenda, adding that his lame duck situation represents “the best position to promote it,” while blaming the National Rifle Association for curtailing previous attempts to regulate firearms in the United States.
Noting that after previous mass shootings efforts to impose gun control measures “disappointingly always fail,” the editorial expresses the desire that the “gunman’s cruelty and evil may provide a strong momentum and broader public support for the restart of gun control efforts.”
The article adds that Barack Obama should begin “to make preparation for a protracted war,” with a massive political cost if he wants to eviscerate the second amendment.
As Brandon Darby points out, “The current Chinese government, the communist People’s Republic of China, was established in a revolution led by Mao Zedong, who killed an estimated 40-70 million people with starvation, executions, and re-education camps.”
Indeed, it was Mao himself who said “political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.” …
On the one hand china was tricked into buying a huge amount of “US debt” and so has an “interest” in accessing american resources which would be impeded by a well armed population. On the other hand US africom is doing its best to block chinese access to african resources. It appears china is being induced to help dismantle the USA.
The Mexican government is asking the U.S. government to hand over a list of all gun owned by residents in Border States.