Gideon Rachman’s 2008 article titled ‘And now for a world government’ and, more recently, Scientific American- editor Gary Stix’s piece Effective World Government Will be Needed to Stave Off Climate Catastrophe, illustrate a widespread and dangerous misconception. It also demonstrates the cunning of one world- propagandists in the crafting of their arguments. In Rachman’s article we are shown typical Palaeolithic artistry: horses, warriors, deer and, portrayed on the very same rocky surface, a globe. It is almost admirable were it not so deviously cunning, to bundle within a single image the primitive with the “modern” and by doing so, considering the latter as the logical conclusion of the former. Rachman explains:
‘For the first time since homo sapiens began to doodle on cave walls, there is an argument, an opportunity and a means to make serious steps towards a world government.’
This statement may be considered as the basic assumption out of which a lot of these globalists’ musings emanate. Point of departure is always the human journey, that once upon a time began with cave-scribbling tribes scattered aimlessly on the planet surface, in the course of time crystallizing into sophisticated city-states, in turn evolving into even more sophisticated nation-states- and finally, approaching present-day, culminating into one world-state, eclipsing all of the above.
It sounds logical, treacherously logical. As we take a closer look at this line of reasoning however, we immediately encounter difficulties. The logic as it turns out, is not so logical after all- and besides, without long term historical precedent. History is certainly littered with tyrants and their attempts to bring about overarching supranational states. And without exception, their enterprises eventually failed, forcing freedom loving people throughout history to build firewalls against tyranny, at the same time compelling the elite to refocus their eyes on more modest ambitions.
That the implementation of a one world government is not some magical or mysterious suggestion that can only be understood by an arduous reading between the lines, as some naive debunkers have suggested, has been disproven by the fact that the aim of global government has been spelled out for us word for word by overeager transnationalists and the think tanks they tend to assemble in. Like any governmental decree, the implementation of an actual world state to replace the nation-state of old requires a theoretical legitimization. The people designated to clear the theoretical brushes, so to speak, have been picked from the marble halls of academia. In this article I will shed some light on some of these.
These academicians have no concept of the larger picture. They are acting out the emergent interests of the system, not the people embedded in the system. If you think washington is corrupt, think how much worse it would be if they never had a constitution to ignore or a constituency they had to lie to. No more pretense of self governance, just brute force and top-down control, always in the name of the greater good as judged by the experts. Medieval royalty would feel right at home.
This is not a voluntary cooperative arrangement among self-governing nations. It’s a hostile takeover by the hidden cartel that controls the central banks of those nations. Follow the money up the food chain. Where does it come from, who controls it, what are their interests? Clearly, the answer to the last question is war and genocide. War because it forces governments into debt to their central banks as it expands the victorious bank’s debt-based monetary domain (currency has always been the foundational mechanism of empire), and genocide as increasing mechanization, diminishing unconquered territory and rising public awareness transform billions of useful debt-bonded serfs into dangerously conscious competitors for power. World war fulfills the debt kings’ interests quite nicely.