Declaration of Repudiation

They murdered our president.  They tricked us into waging wars against countless innocents for their own profit.  They have vandalized the genetic code of our food crops and made them toxic.  They poison our children with their narcotics and toxic vaccines.    They make a mockery of our elections and political processes.  They have waged a covert war against our families.  They have made us hated around the world for the crimes which they committed in our names.

They do not lead us, they hide behind us.  They need us to be in denial of their treachery so they can continue using us.   In the arrogance they have built upon their monomaniacal greed they imagine themselves to be superior, but they have stood darwin on his head.  Compassion and empathy are the foundations of social power.  They have neither.   They would turn our beautiful earthly home into the smoldering ruin that they inhabit in their minds.

They are everyone’s enemy.   Their fear is evident, as is their weakness.  They are cowards.  They have no vision and no insight.  They are going to lose.

If the world’s intelligence agencies are worth a hill of beans, they know where the enemies of humanity reside.   If they were blood-sucking insects from another planet there would be no question of what to do.  For all practical purposes, they might as well be blood-sucking insects from another planet.  They are modern-day dinosaurs, heirs to a long extinct feudal system built on superstition and fear.  Hardly the stuff of an enlightened space-faring civilization.

They claim to represent us.  They do not represent us.  They parasitize us.  They have abrogated the contract.  It is null and void.  Everything is on the table.   Seize the future.

Child Abuse as a Tool of Social Control

Sniping US Soldiers in Iraq: An Inside Job

9/11 In Your Face

Patented GMO Food Gene Induces Human Sterility

The CIA and the Crack Cocaine Epidemic

The vaccine discovery that destroyed Judy Mikovitz’s career

The Real Election Hack: Black Box Voting

Media Matters Chat Hacked, Run Like Military Psyop

The War on Empathy, Love and Family

Pilger: The Long Secret Alliance: Uncle Sam and Pol Pot

Border Crisis: The Crocodile Tears of the Empire

The Obvious Problem With Secret Societies

Iceman Tapes: Inside the Mind of a Mafia Hitman

American Academy of Environmental Medicine on GMOs

“… safety assessment of GM foods has been based on the idea of “substantial equivalence” such that “if a new food is found to be substantially equivalent in composition and nutritional characteristics to an existing food, it can be regarded as safe as the conventional food.”4 However, several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food consumption including infertility, immune dysregulation, accelerated aging, dysregulation of genes associated with cholesterol synthesis, insulin regulation, cell signaling, and protein formation, and changes in the liver, kidney, spleen and gastrointestinal system.

“There is more than a casual association between GM foods and adverse health effects. There is causation as defined by Hill’s Criteria in the areas of strength of association, consistency, specificity, biological gradient, and biological plausibility.5 The strength of association and consistency between GM foods and disease is confirmed in several animal studies.2,6,7,8,9,10,11

“Specificity of the association of GM foods and specific disease processes is also supported. Multiple animal studies show significant immune dysregulation, including upregulation of cytokines associated with asthma, allergy, and inflammation. 6,11 Animal studies also show altered structure and function of the liver, including altered lipid and carbohydrate metabolism as well as cellular changes that could lead to accelerated aging and possibly lead to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). 7,8,10 Changes in the kidney, pancreas and spleen have also been documented. 6,8,10 A recent 2008 study links GM corn with infertility, showing a significant decrease in offspring over time and significantly lower litter weight in mice fed GM corn.8 This study also found that over 400 genes were found to be expressed differently in the mice fed GM corn. These are genes known to control protein synthesis and modification, cell signaling, cholesterol synthesis, and insulin regulation. Studies also show intestinal damage in animals fed GM foods, including proliferative cell growth9 and disruption of the intestinal immune system.6

“Regarding biological gradient, one study, done by Kroghsbo, et al., has shown that rats fed transgenic Bt rice trended to a dose related response for Bt specific IgA. 11

“Also, because of the mounting data, it is biologically plausible for Genetically Modified Foods to cause adverse health effects in humans.

“In spite of this risk, the biotechnology industry claims that GM foods can feed the world through production of higher crop yields. However, a recent report by the Union of Concerned Scientists reviewed 12 academic studies and indicates otherwise: “The several thousand field trials over the last 20 years for genes aimed at increasing operational or intrinsic yield (of crops) indicate a significant undertaking. Yet none of these field trials have resulted in increased yield in commercialized major food/feed crops, with the exception of Bt corn.”12 However, it was further stated that this increase is largely due to traditional breeding improvements.

“Therefore, because GM foods pose a serious health risk in the areas of toxicology, allergy and immune function, reproductive health, and metabolic, physiologic and genetic health and are without benefit, the AAEM believes that it is imperative to adopt the precautionary principle, which is one of the main regulatory tools of the European Union environmental and health policy and serves as a foundation for several international agreements.13 The most commonly used definition is from the 1992 Rio Declaration that states: “In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation.”13