There isn’t a slow-motion coup in process right now

And 9/11 isn’t a fraud and the federal reserve isn’t run by a gang of thieves and the huge  bonuses on wall street after the “bailout” weren’t for a job well done.  Oh, and “there has never been a conspiracy in this country.”

“Back in 1992 the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff held a “Strategy Essay Competition.”

The winner was a National War College student paper entitled, “The Origins of the American Military Coup of 2012.” Authored by Colonel Charles J. Dunlap, Jr. the paper is a well documented, “darkly imagined excursion into the future.” The ostensibly fictional work is written from the perspective of an imprisoned senior military officer about to be executed for opposing the military takeover of America, a coup accomplished through “legal” means. The essay makes the point that the coup was “the outgrowth of trends visible as far back as 1992,” including “the massive diversion of military forces to civilian uses,” particularly law enforcement.

Dunlap cites what he considered a dangerous precedent, the 1981 Military Cooperation with Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies Act, an act that sanctioned US military engagement with law enforcement in domestic “support operations,” including “civil disturbance” operations. The act codified the lawful status and use of military “assets” in domestic police work.

“Encroachment upon Basic Freedoms

“Since that time the American people have been subject to a series of deeper and deeper encroachments upon our basic freedoms, increasingly extensive deployment of military operations on the home front, perpetrated by a corporate driven military mission creep that now claims the right and duty to arrest and detain us on the word of a Pentagon or White House operative. President Obama’s signing of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) whose Section 1021 sanctions the military detention of American citizens without charge, essentially aims to put the last nail in the coffin of our Constitution, our teetering Republic and our most basic democratic traditions.

“The statute contains a sweeping worldwide indefinite detention provision. While President Obama issued a signing statement saying he had “serious reservations” about the provisions, the statement only applies to how his administration (“you can trust me”) would use the authorities granted by the NDAA, and would not affect how the law is interpreted by subsequent administrations. The White House had threatened to veto an earlier version of the NDAA, but reversed course (of course) shortly before Congress voted on the final bill, which the President signed on the 31st of December 2011, a day that will go down in infamy.

“President Obama’s action today is a blight on his legacy because he will forever be known as the president who signed indefinite detention without charge or trial into law,” said Anthony D. Romero, ACLU executive director. “The statute is particularly dangerous because it has no temporal or geographic limitations, and can be used by this and future presidents to militarily detain people captured far from any battlefield.” According to Senator Dianne Feinstein. “Congress is essentially authorizing the indefinite imprisonment of American citizens, without charge,” she said. “We are not a nation that locks up its citizens without charge.” Think again. (Guardian, 12/14/11)

“Under the legislation, suspects can be held without trial  “until the end of hostilities.” They will have the right to appear once a year before a committee that will decide if the detention will continue. A spokesperson for Human Rights Watch implied that the signing of such a bill by a President would have once been unthinkable, noting that “the paradigm of the war on terror has advanced so far in people’s minds that this has to appear more normal than it actually is.” Further, “it wasn’t asked for by any of the agencies on the frontlines in the fight against terrorism in the United States. It breaks with over 200 years of tradition in America against using the military in domestic affairs.”

“In fact, the heads of several “security agencies,” including the FBI, CIA, the director of national intelligence and the attorney general objected to the legislation. Even some within the Pentagon itself said they were against the bill. No matter, and no matter the intention inherent in lip service opposition, the corporate elite who drive the disastrous and inhumane polices of this country see it otherwise, and they, not the generals or anyone else, call the shots! …”

The last paragraph is crucial.  This is a takeover by a clique of secretive corporate fraudsters and european aristocrats whose power derives from the pieces of paper that they control.  That’s it.  The whole thing is based on a mass hallucination!  What a world.

Obama’s Fake Help for Victimized Homeowners

Arab “Springs”, like Winters, are made in USA

Of course it doesn’t take much dot-connecting to realize Obama’s concern over the sustainability of US puppet regimes in oil-istan has more to do with ensuring that the next regime is also amenable to western interests.  Not unlike the demopublican framework of american politics.

At some point the gullibility of the “progressive” media must be seen as complicity.

The Government Doesn’t Import Street Drugs Into the USA

And it hasn’t been doing it for decades, from the vietnam invasion right up through the afghan invasion.   And it won’t continue to do so into the forseeable future because there aren’t hundreds of billions of drug dollars laundered through wallstreet and it doesn’t finance covert operations or prop up the dollar and there’s no such thing as corruption in government.  To quote Dewey Clarridge, former CIA operations officer: “There has never been a conspiracy in this country.”   And if you don’t believe that you’re a conspiracy kook.

CDC says fluoride has no evidence of benefit for infants

“In a letter to California senator Barbara Boxer the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) director Thomas Frieden responded to questions about fluoride and infants. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 1997 set the adequate amount of fluoride for infants 0 to 6 months of age at .01 milligrams per day, which is the amount of fluoride found in breast milk. The CDC was asked if more fluoride than the adequate amount was beneficial. CDCdirector Frieden wrote “We are unaware of data that directly answers your questions about the additional protection from tooth decay that could result from greater daily fluoride intake by infants, 0-6 months of age.” In other words, there is no scientific evidence that dosing babies with lots of fluoride has any benefit at all.

“When powdered infant formula is prepared with fluoridated tap water infants get a very large dose of fluoride, and it can exceed the “tolerable upper intake level” of .7 milligrams per day set by the IOM in 1997. When asked what adverse health effects could occur when infants exceed the “tolerable upper intake level” director Frieden responded that the level was set to minimize the risk of moderate and severe dental fluorosis – a developmental disturbance in children. Fluorosis means discolored malformed teeth, which can be stained brown or black. Other adverse health effects of inadvertently dosing babies with heavy doses of fluoride are not considered important by government agencies. …”

Apparently it IS considered important to continue the practice, given washington’s ongoing efforts to keep fluoride in municipal water supplies.  For what reason they won’t say, but it probably has to do with the expense of properly disposing of this major industrial toxin.
But who knows, maybe local supermarkets will stop selling fluoridated infant formula water to unwary parents.  Don’t hold your breath.
Check out the first podcast listed on the right, the interview with Paul Connett.  The fluoride pushers can’t even be bothered to purify the stuff.  It’s just raw industrial effluent.

Obama Trade Document Leaked, Revealing New Corporate Powers And Broken Campaign Promises

“A critical document from President Barack Obama’s free trade negotiations with eight Pacific nations was leaked online early Wednesday morning, revealing that the administration intends to bestow radical new political powers upon multinational corporations, contradicting prior promises. …

“The outrageous stuff in this leaked text may well be why U.S. trade officials have been so extremely secretive about these past two years of [trade] negotiations,” said Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch in a written statement. …

“The newly leaked document is one of the most controversial of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact. It addresses a broad sweep of regulations governing international investment and reveals the Obama administration’s advocacy for policies that environmental activists, financial reform advocates and labor unions have long rejected for eroding key protections currently in domestic laws.

“Under the agreement currently being advocated by the Obama administration, American corporations would continue to be subject to domestic laws and regulations on the environment, banking and other issues. But foreign corporations operating within the U.S. would be permitted to appeal key American legal or regulatory rulings to an international tribunal. That international tribunal would be granted the power to overrule American law and impose trade sanctions on the United States for failing to abide by its rulings. …”

Aside from the obvious impact on labor rights and the environment, this is a recipe for driving even more jobs offshore, continuing the deliberate deindustrialization policy that began under clinton.  This is a bipartisan colonial effort.

Mercury found in Chinese baby formula

Most likely from the high fructose corn syrup they put in baby formula.

It seems the chinese have adopted the western medical model of wholesale child abuse by depriving babies of their mothers’ milk.  Lots of toxic trafficking going on in both directions between china and the USA.

Silver market provides glimpse of elite machinations and plans for USA

Once you realize the manipulation of silver is a “government” operation, and that AIG  (a cutout for the CIA) used to be the main silver manipulator before going on to bigger things like being a conduit for the looting of the US taxpayer by goldman sachs via credit default swaps against the engineered housing collapse, which itself is key to the controlled demolition of the middle class etc, it becomes clear that the puppet masters who control the monetary system intend to destroy this country for profit.  Again, it’s called the shock doctrine and you need to get a copy of the book by the same name to see how it works.  Or increase your dosage of psych drugs if you prefer.

Silver is a natural for a form of currency, but it’s much more plentiful than gold and so harder to corner the market for it.  This is why the aristocrats hate it.