New Figures: Earth Hasn’t Warmed Since 1997

The supposed ‘consensus’ on man-made global warming is facing an inconvenient challenge after the release of new temperature data showing the planet has not warmed for the past 15 years.

“The figures suggest that we could even be heading for a mini ice age to rival the 70-year temperature drop that saw frost fairs held on the Thames in the 17th Century.

“Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997.”

The social controllers’ and high finance scam artists’ energy scarcity agenda has been debunked again.  Needless to say the increase in atmospheric CO2 has continued unabated, so not only has human energy consumption been eliminated as a factor in global temperature but the entire foundation of the supposedly scientific consensus that the elitist bankers’ propagandists have been telling us about has been decimated.   If CO2 has any significant effect on planetary albedo, the effects would have to be manifested in other ways, such as increased rainfall and accelerated plant growth.

Environmentalists should now consider how the environmental destruction due to real industrial pollutantants like mercury, fluoride, pesticides, herbicides, endocrine disruptors, genetic corruption etc etc etc etc has continued unabated while this media non-event has diverted our focus into a blind alley and a supposed need to shut down the energy consumption that fuels the things that people need to physically survive.

Alex Jones is right.  The agenda is depopulation.  But if you find yourself agreeing with the need for your own extermination and the extermination of your children, you should consider a few slightly complicating factors that should influence your beliefs about the inherent toxicity of the human race.

1) The debt based monetary system, which absolutely guarantees and profits from war and the cyclical expansion and contraction of the economy, leading to environmental destruction and human misery of epic proportions.

2) Planned obsolescence, which was introduced as a remedy for unemployment, which itself is a needless consequence of (1).  See “The Light Bulb Conspiracy“.  The environmental waste and destruction produced by this systemic problem is beyond human comprehension.  Go to the nearest landfill dump if you need reminding of how needlessly destructive our consumer economy is.

3) Economic polarization, which is severely exacerbated, though not entirely caused by (1).  This creates needless turmoil in society and results in all the environmental destruction associated with human violence and deprivation.

4) Political corruption, which heaps injustice on those who can’t afford the lobbyists who are largely employed by the beneficiaries of (1).  Again, environmental destruction of poor neighborhoods and the so-called 3rd world is the result.

5) The people deciding who would survive the global culling would be the worst of the worst parasites and psychopathic scum imaginable.  Do you really want to donate the earth to these people?  Has their mass-indoctrination and education system finally hammered out the last of your self-respect and will to survive?

The MO of the globalists is manifest here as in so many other realms: create a massive problem (false flag terrorism, drug war, psych-drug-caused gun massacres, “global warming”) and then arrange to benefit from its solution.   See: http://www.amerikanexpose.com/hegel/

The foundation of social control and aristocratic rule hasn’t changed since pharaoh cast spells to make the Nile river rise and justify his taxation of the people.  It is deception.

(see comments for my mea culpa re: the above)

error

3 thoughts on “New Figures: Earth Hasn’t Warmed Since 1997”

  1. As a layman, schooled in basic science and critical thinking, this anthropogenic climate change debate is giving me psychic whiplash. I see postings like this one here from the Daily Mail, and I see postings like http://skepticalscience.com/New_temperature_record_for_the_Arctic_in_2011.html which presents diametrically opposed conclusions. I’m not competent to evaluate the competing data, and don’t have time to become a climate scientist. What’s a good citizen to do? Can’t someone sort this all out and give a straight answer?
    The evidence arrayed against the Deniers as dupes of the American Petroleum Institute is very strong (see Naomi Oreskes’ analysis http://www.csmonitor.com/Books/Book-Reviews/2010/0622/Merchants-of-Doubt ). Arguments that the IPCC is biased and subjected to pressure to fudge results have merit as well.
    WTF? Over

    1. It’s clear there are powerful entrenched interests on both sides of the issue. One thing that I concluded some time ago (as a computer guy with a mathematics and physics background, FWIW) is that the IPCC has oversold the reliability of its computer models. Normally one might attribute this to the usual pressure for results in scientific research, but in the context of the seemingly orchestrated and well funded PR campaign, the faked climate consensus, the elite’s sudden interest in this particular aspect of the environment, the genocidal implications of the proposed solutions such as wall street’s carbon trading scam, and the long-established depopulation agenda, it started looking pretty sinister to me awhile ago. But I’d say that 15 years of consistently stable average temps in the face of rising carbon combustion is pretty solid evidence.

      But it occurs to me (insert foot in mouth) that there is one big monkeywrench in all this: what impact have chemtrails had on average global temperatures? That is their alleged purpose (or one of them) after all…

  2. “15 years of consistently stable average temps in the face of rising carbon combustion is pretty solid evidence” is disputed here http://www.skepticalscience.com/updating-the-big-picture.html
    Figures can lie, liars can figure. On balance, I have to defer to the warming-is-real crowd. How else to explain outright fraud by the Deniers (e.g. Patrick Michaels, see http://skepticalscience.com/patrick-michaels-serial-deleter-of-inconvenient-data.html ) The sociopathic policies developed to exploit the problem, as outlined in your excellent post, are better tackled without the distractions of a phony science debate.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.