US Hunger Rate Triple That of China

American workers are now three times more likely than Chinese workers to lack the means of feeding their families, according to a startling new report from the Gallup organization. The polling group found that 19 percent of Americans worried about being able to feed themselves or their families, compared to only 6 percent of Chinese.

The Gallup finding showed a near reversal in the proportions of American and Chinese workers at risk of hunger over the past three years, an indication of the shattering impact of the economic slump brought on by the 2008 Wall Street financial crash. In 2008, 16 percent of Chinese said they at times lacked the money to put food on the table, compared to 9 percent of Americans.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27122

US Begins Huge Military Maneuvers Aimed at Iran

As we reported last week, during US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s October 3 Tel Aviv visit, Israeli hawks attempted to persuade Panetta to give the green light for a military strike on Iran. Within ten days, details of an alleged assassination plot against a Saudi ambassador emerged and the foiled attack was blamed on Iran. Innumerable experts immediately voiced their doubts about the authenticity of the plot, with 21-year CIA veteran Robert Baer labeling the story “a truly awful Hollywood script”.”

http://www.prisonplanet.com/us-begins-huge-military-maneuvers-aimed-at-iran.html

The Goldman Sachs President Mounts PR Smokescreen to Co-opt OWS

His handlers know OWS is growing and may become a serious political force.  They’d be foolish to overlook the political opportunity.  Co-option and redirection of rising political movements is a prime tool of social control, far more cost-effective than outright repression.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/white-house-draws-closer-to-occupy-wall-street-says-obama-is-fighting-for-the-interests-of-the-99.html

Just remember who joined with bush in saddling future generations with crushing “debt” to pay off wall street’s gambling debts, while blocking any provision to aid scammed homeowners in danger of foreclosure:

AMY GOODMAN: Congressman Kucinich, can you explain how it is that the Democrats are in charge, yet the Democrats back down on their demand to give bankruptcy judges authority to alter the terms of mortgages for homeowners facing foreclosure, that Democrats also failed in their attempt to steer a portion of any government profits from the package to affordable housing programs?

REP. DENNIS KUCINICH: Well, I mean, those are two of the most glaring deficiencies in this bill. And I would maintain there was never any intention to — you know, well, many members of Congress had the intention of helping people who were in foreclosure. You know, this — Wall Street doesn’t want to do that. Wall Street wants to grab whatever change they can and equity that’s left in these properties. So —-

AMY GOODMAN: Right, but the Democrats are in charge of this.

REP. DENNIS KUCINICH: Right. You know, I’ll tell you something that we were told in our caucus. We were told that our presidential candidate, when the negotiations started at the White House, said that he didn’t want this in this bill. Now, that’s what we were told.

AMY GOODMAN: You were told that Barack Obama did not want this in the bill?

REP. DENNIS KUCINICH: That he didn’t want the bankruptcy provisions in the bill. Now, you know, that’s what we were told. And I don’t understand why he would say that, if he did say that. And I think that there is a -— the fact that we didn’t put bankruptcy provisions in, that actually we removed any hope for judges to do any loan modifications or any forbearance. There’s no moratorium on mortgage foreclosures in here. So, who’s getting — who’s really getting helped by this bill? This is a bailout, pure and simple, of Wall Street interests who have been involved in speculation.

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/9/29/is_this_the_united_states_congress

Eugenics 101

Globalists make no secret of precisely what they plan for you and me. They have been quite clear for a very long time. We have refused to believe that they were serious. They were.

Read what philosopher and mathematician Bertrand Russel, 3rd Earl of Russell, OM, FRS (1872 – 1970) had to say in his widely read book, The Impact of Science on Society:

On Diet and Vaccinations
“Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.”

[Emphasis added – REL]

On Selective Breeding
“Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers [Them – REL] and ruled [Us – REL] will increase until they become almost different species [Through carefully introduced foreign DNA via vaccines and GMO “PHUDE”, perhaps? – REL]. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.

[Hear that, Plebes? – REL]

On Education
“In like manner, the scientific rulers will provide one kind of education for ordinary men and women, and another for those who are to become holders of scientific (international banker) power. Ordinary men and women will be expected to be docile, industrious, punctual, thoughtless, and contented

[Why won’t ___________ (fill in the blank) listen to me, see the evidence and stop brushing their teeth with fluoride and believing the official lies, you ask. Perhaps “scientific” education has succeeded with them and failed with you! – REL]. Of these qualities, probably contentment will be considered the most important. In order to produce it, all the researches of psycho-analysis, behaviourism, and biochemistry will be brought into play” [Psychiatric drugs, anyone? Toothpaste and water fluoridation? Mercury fillings? Need I continue? – REL]

http://newresearchfindingstwo.blogspot.com/2010/08/bertrand-russell-impact-of-science-on.html

Pretty Words From David Rockefeller Justifying UN-Directed Population Control/Reduction: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClqUcScwnn8

Not Such Pretty Words From David Rockefeller:

“For more than a century, ideological extreamests at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well publicized incidents…to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the globe to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty and I am proud of it.” – Memoirs, 2002 New York: Random House

Margaret Sanger, MD, Founder of Planned Parenthood Had a Plan to Eliminate the “Black Race” as Abundant For “racial “purification,” couples who chose sterilization should be rewarded, see Birth Control in America, The Career of Margaret Sanger, by David Kennedy, p. 117, quoting a 1923 Sanger speech).

Couples, she said, should be required to submit applications and receive approval to have a child (“Plan for Peace.” in Birth Control Review, April 1932)

Sanger taught that the genetic makeup of the poor, and minorities, was inferior and should. (Pivot of Civilization, by Margaret Sanger, 1922, p. 80) and that birth control should be used “to create a race of thoroughbreds,” (The Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2)), creating “More children from the fit, less from the unfit — that is the chief aim of birth control.” (Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12) “to prevent the multiplication of bad stocks,” as Dr. Sanger’s colleague, Dr. Ernst Rudin, said (April 1933 Birth Control Review). Americans were, according to these genocidal luminaries, to “restrict the propagation of those physically, mentally and socially inadequate.” whom Sanger referred to as “human weeds,” “reckless breeders,” “spawning … human beings who never should have been born.”(Pivot of Civlilization)

[Other things, very evil things were happening in 1933, so maybe Americans didn’t notice that Nazi eugenics started at home, ‘made in America’ and that propensity continues into the present day.]

When you read what Sanger said about extermination of her chosen group, substitute any other group, in fact, substitute you and your family and see if vaccination to produce disease and sterility, deadly food, mind numbing drugs and dismal education might be tools against you and your community. Sanger said “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” she said, “if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” (Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America, by Linda Gordon).

UN Policies, Like Agenda 21, Are Explicit About Population Reduction As a Goal:

“… population growth rates have been declining globally, largely as a result of expanded basic education and health care. That trend is projected to lead to a stable world population in the middle of the twenty-first century… The current decline in population growth rates must be further promoted through national and international policies [Empahsis added – REL] that promote economic development, social development, environmental protection, and poverty eradication, particularly the further expansion of basic education, with full and equal access for girls and women, and health care, including reproductive health care, including both family planning and sexual health, consistent with the report of the International Conference on Population and Development.�? — UN document S/19-2. Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21 (par. 30 at http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/spec/aress19-2.htm)

And, let us not forget the infamous National Security Memorandum, 1974, written by Henry Kissinger

NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20506
April 24, 1974 National Security Study Memorandum 200
[…] 29. While specific goals in this area are difficult to state, our aim should be for the world to achieve a replacement level of fertility, (a two-child family on the average), by about the year 2000. This will require the present 2 percent growth rate to decline to 1.7 percent within a decade and to 1.1 percent by 2000. Compared to the U.N medium projection, this goal would result in 500 million fewer people in 2000 and about 3 billion fewer in 2050. Attainment of this goal will require greatly intensified population programs. A basis for developing national population growth control targets to achieve this world target is contained in the World Population Plan of Action. htttp://www.whale.to/v/memorandum.html

Tragically, the list goes on and on and on and on. The message is clear: the globalist “elite” want us dead, and have told us so in no uncertain terms. They are willing to use any means at hand, and create more as they go, to achieve that goal.

More here: http://tinyurl.com/naturalhealthsolutions

And Now a Word From Our Side: Plebes and Useless Eaters Disagree!

Dr. Rima wrote this in 2007:
Must Read! http://loveforlife.com.au/content/07/03/26/eugenics-dr-rima-laibow-md
The Genocidal Agenda: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8f2P4GCJL8
The Genocidal Feast: http://mefeedia.com/entry/azk-vortrag-codex-alimentarius-dr-rima-e-laibow/15028922
Nutricide: The Killing Camps of Codex: www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=322

https://web.archive.org/web/20121214115233/http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=10372

Control Freaks Working on Criminalization of Vitamins

http://www.naturalnews.com/033892_Trilateral_Cooperation_Charter_health_freedom.html

Does anyone really doubt that we live under a totalitarian nightmare?  Do you think the poisoning of the food, the harming of children, the impending restrictions on essential vitamins is happening by accident?  Are you waiting for the federal government to officially declare war on the united states?  Why should they, when people are so good at living in denial?

Are you confident that there are too many people in the world?  Regardless of the pathological monetary system we live under which maximizes waste, environmental destruction and human misery?  Because in all likelihood, we are experiencing the systematic application of policies to fix the “problem” of overpopulation.