The HIV argument is another deception to compound all the
deceptions that went before. MGM appears to reduce per-intercourse F->M HIV transmission by about 60%. That’s it. 40% of the time it doesn’t work.
What is missing from this discussion, aside from the fact that the foreskin includes the primary erogenous zone of the male body
http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/taylor/
http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/cold-taylor/
and was specifically designed to desensitize the penis by rabbinical
scholars and quack medical doctors?
http://www.cirp.org/library/cultural/yedaiah1/
http://www.cirp.org/library/cultural/maimonides/
http://www.cirp.org/pages/whycirc.html
And so can be expected to increase sexual promiscuity and help to spread HIV
Clearly what is missing from the HIV argument is MGM’s impact on
M->F transmission. There is compelling empirical and experimental
evidence that MGM increases M->F transmission rates by more than enough to have a net effect of increasing overall transmission
rates. This is due to increased vaginal abrasion, which compromises
the very effective HIV barrier presented by intact vaginal epithelium.
http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/
http://jvi.asm.org/cgi/content/full/74/12/5577?view=long&pmid=10823865
http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/HIV/chao/
http://www.circumstitions.com/HIV.html#hetero
The USA has the highest divorce rate, the highest HIV rate and the
second-highest MGM rate in the industrialized world. Is this a
coincidence? I doubt it.
Furthermore, it turns out that FGM has a similar effect on female
receptivity to HIV as MGM has on male receptivity.
http://www.aegis.com/conferences/IASHIVPT/2005/TuOa0401.html
This is probably indicative of the similarity of the tissue-type
and extent of loss caused by both types of atrocities.
Finally it should be pointed out that our so-called professional
medical organizations have a long history of such deceptive
pronouncements wrt MGM, which has been promoted as a “remedy” for everything from masturbatory insanity to clubfoot to doctor-caused problems like forcible foreskin retraction leading to phimosis and UTI’s. As each of these bogus arguments has fallen a new one is found. This pattern can be readily seen to reflect their enormous fear of being exposed for the child abusers and marriage wreckers that they are.
-rw